A Republican election official in north suburban Lake County is using a slew of "compromised" voter registration forms to stoke concern about the potential for election fraud on November 4. If she gets her way, County Clerk Willard Helander may even institute a de facto voter ID law in certain precincts, which has the potential to disenfranchise countless voters.
Starting in mid-August, Helander's staff began flagging questionable mail-in voter registration applications -- over 1,000 in total by the time the October 7 registration deadline passed. All told, those cards make up a fairly small fraction of the 28,020 new registrations fielded by the clerk since the summer. They've since been set aside for investigation by the county's state's attorney and sheriff offices.
Even though the "compromised" registrations have not been added to the voter rolls, Helander has asked the state's attorney whether she could legally require voters to present some form of identification in the precincts where most of the problematic forms originated. Incidentally, those areas -- Waukegan, North Chicago, and Zion -- tend to lean Democratic. As such, this proposal raises questions about whether the Republican official is simply intent on overseeing a fair election or using broad concerns about "voter fraud" to suppress Democratic votes in the county, which will play a pivotal role in the tight race for the 10th Congressional District.
"There's a clear difference between registration problems and election fraud," said University of Illinois at Chicago political science professor Dick Simpson when asked about the case. "Probably some of them are legitimate mistakes. The election fraud comes down to whether you actually try to vote dead people."
Indeed, a recent Indianapolis Star article quoted an election law expert noting the scant evidence that bogus voter registrations actually lead to fraud at the ballot box:
[A]n independent voting law expert dismissed concerns that the application flap creates a significant opportunity for voter fraud in Indiana.
Nathaniel Persily, a Columbia Law School professor, said registration fraud is very different from actual voter fraud, which occurs at the polls.
"The effect is not going to change the outcome of the election or allow imaginary people to vote," he said.
NYU's Brennan Center for Justice has also looked into the recurring allegations of voter fraud from the right in previous election years and found that they generally "amount to a great deal of smoke without much fire."
One group that Helander is citing as a source of many questionable registrations is the Voters Participation Center (VPC). VPC works under the umbrella of the Women's Voices/Women's Vote project, which set out in August to add one million unmarried women to the voter rolls nationwide. VPC spokeswoman Sarah Johnson said some of the mistakes can be attributed to the way information on the unregistered population is gathered.
According to Johnson, VCP hired a commercial data company to identify each of potential voters by compiling magazine and newspaper subscription lists, cross-checking them against voter registration files, and then sending out the applications in bulk. It was up to those who received the forms to complete the process themselves and VPC says 66,860 women in Illinois did just that.
While Women's Voices/Women's Vote's registration methods have been the subject of deserved criticism, there's no evidence that they've led to voter fraud. "We're clearly not impeaching on any sort of fraudulent behavior," Johnson said. "Our goal is registering and getting people out to vote."
Other problematic registrations were delivered to the Lake Co. Clerk's office by hand. Many of those applications featured addresses that "did not exist in Lake County."
But now that the faulty registrations have been weeded out, the real problem could be Helander's idea to enforce an ID requirement in certain precincts -- just two weeks before Election Day -- thereby potentially blocking legitimate voters who don't bring along the required identification.
Helander counters that such disenfranchisement is not her intention. "I don't care where you live, what your interests or who you support," she said. "My job is to make sure that everyone has the fair opportunity to vote."
UPDATE (4:50pm): Archpundit adds this points to this section of the voter registration instructions (PDF) in Illinois:
If you do not have a driver’s license, State Identification Card or social security number, and this form is submitted by mail, and you have never registered to vote in the jurisdiction you are now registering in, then you must send, with this application, either (i) a copy of a current and valid photo identification, or (ii) a copy of a current utility bill, bank statement, government check, paycheck, or other government document that shows the name and address of the voter. If you do not provide the information required above, then you will be required to provide election officials with either (i) or (ii) described above the first time you vote at a voting place or by absentee ballot.
He adds:
Everyone in Illinois has had to prove their identity or they do so when they first vote. There’s no point in checking everyone when anyone who is a new registrant by mail has to provide proof of identity already.







Comments
Willard Helander (not verified) on Tue, 10/21/2008 - 17:49
Angela,
To clarify a couple of things in your article -you wrote "even though 'compromised' registration have not been added" - I actually stated that the 890+ records with addresses that DO NOT exist in Lake County were NOT processed and were not at risk of impacting the integrity of the election. Likewise we were not afraid of gold fish (dead ones) voting.
I pointed out the real concern dealt with records processed (address existed and voter name was matched with the last for digits of social security) and residents notified us that the voters do not live there. I noted that the social security database has no address in the state system - so there is no verification of where one lives. Once the social or DMV match is made, the voter does not need to vote in person and does not need to show ID when they vote (in person or by mail). We processed hundreds, potentially thousands.
I have not called for ID requirement on Election Day - I have called that the voter registration process needs reform. An out-of-state attorney who wanted information about the records and our procedures raised the case of an IL county where a court ordered that ID be required. I have been very specific that the county clerk can not require ID unless the voter signature does not match, a challenge is made or the voter registered on the mail form and did not match in DMV, social security or show ID via mail or fax. Only a court could order otherwise.
It is incorrect to state that the faulty registrations have been weeded out. We have no way to know how many there are. I trust you desire to be fair and accurate will include posting my comments in regard to your article.
Willard Helander
markg8 on Wed, 10/22/2008 - 06:39
The Illinois voter registration process does needs reform. All new voters are required to show a photo ID and one other form of proof of residence either when they register or at the polling place the first time they vote. This effectively excludes the homeless from voting. The Motor Voter Act effectively excludes those who register via the DMV from voting in any but federal elections.
Using databases like the SSA to match voter registrations is problematic as they are inaccurate. Name me one working age person who has ever sent a change of address form to the SSA when they moved. When challengers are allowed to butt in when someone signs in to vote as "George Bush" instead of "George W. Bush" as it's written on his ID that goes beyond nitpicking to disenfranchisement.
Then there's the question of "exotic" names. Not everyone is named "John", some people have names like "Barack". All too often a registrar or a election clerk will transcribe these names or even addresses incorrectly.
For instance In DuPage on Super Tuesday a voter in my precinct in Downers Grove wasn't allowed to vote because he was listed at a nonexistent address. This young man had registered together with his mother who lived at the same address at the DMV. She was on the voter roll at our polling place but he was not. A quick check on the Ask Ed wireless registration database handheld showed his polling place to be on the other side of the county in Wayne Township. A call to the DuPage County Election Commission the next day showed the problem. His street number was listed as 13 which doesn't exist, instead of 12 where he lives, a simple typo. Inexplicably the clerk told me the DCEC database now said his polling place for that nonexistent address was in Naperville!
Ellen Beth Gill (not verified) on Wed, 10/22/2008 - 09:45
Clerk Helander,
I don't think anyone wants to see registration fraud. I just think that people want more specifics on what is being considered fraudulent, what specific data did not match and is there another way it can be verified. Also, I am wondeirng who is making the allegations that new registrants do not live where the registration says they live. Are these non-existent properties or could there be a possible address disagreement where different government bodies have a different address for what is essentially the same property (ie corner buildings that could be referenced under an address for each street they face). I am also unclear how a typical resident can know the details of a registration to challenge it. Are you referring to early voting poll watchers or some other groups? I'd really like to understand who is making these challenges so I can see where you are coming from on that.
Thanks,
Ellen Beth Gill
Post new comment
Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
We will not publish comments that we consider:
Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.