Does New Group Have What It Takes To "Advance Illinois" Education?

A prominent line up of public officials—including former Commerce Secretary William Daley, former Gov. Jim Edgar, and former House Speaker Dennis Hastert—along with some deep-pocketed foundations rolled out the state’s latest education initiative yesterday.

For some time now, the school reform community has had its eye on the emerging group, dubbed Advance Illinois. And they’ve expressed skepticism, to say the least. Judging by today’s lackluster response to the initiative, it appears that the people of Illinois have also grown weary of blue ribbon commissions intended to study what everyone already knows: stark inequities pervade Illinois schools.

Nonetheless, the leaders of Advance Illinois have set out to draft a set of policy recommendations for repairing the state’s “mediocre” education system. In a report released yesterday, the group makes a solid case for why failing to act quickly sets the state up for failure:

Though Illinois boasts the fifth-largest economy in the United States, it is one of the slowest growing in the country. Between 1997 and 2004, only six states had slower-growing economies and, while we are still above the national average, our per capita income has been in a downward slide since 1960.

Within the next six years, 89 percent of jobs in Illinois’ fastest-growing sectors will require some education or training beyond high school. Yet, of Illinois adults over the age of 25, only 36 percent have an associate or bachelor’s degree, and just 20 percent more have pursued some other education beyond high school. As a result, thousands of well-paying jobs go unfilled each year in Illinois.

Setting higher academic standards, improving accountability, and advancing teacher training will likely be the thrust of Advance Illinois’ forthcoming recommendations, which will go before the General Assembly in a year or so.

How the group will recommend funding those initiatives remains unclear. But their initial report makes the case for why investment in education will ultimately bolster the state economy:

- More than $13 billion would be added to Illinois’ economy by 2020 if students of color graduated at the same rate as white students.

- A five percent increase in male high school graduation rates would save Illinois $379 million in incarceration costs and crime related expenses.

- If Illinois’ high schools raised standards, the state would save $81 million annually in remediation for recent high school graduates.

The thing that most Illinois school reform advocates agree on is that money matters. They argue that, without some form of tax reform, kids from low- and middle-income communities won’t have the same technology, books, and other resources needed to keep pace with their peers in wealthier districts.

For years, the Center for Tax and Budget Accountability (CTBA) has stuck with some pretty simple talking points for how to go about reversing the decline in education, which they point out is now eroding academic achievement in middle-class communities. CTBA advocates raising the income tax on high-earners and using the additional revenue to reduce property taxes and invest in education and infrastructure.

We caught up with CTBA assistant executive director Chrissy Mancini to see what she thinks about Advance Illinois. Her response: “How many times do you have to reinvent the wheel?”

“Everyone knows what the problems are,” Mancini added. “There are disparities between rich, poor, black, white. Everyone knows how to solve it.”

Here's another take on the same issue. Parents can tell the story better than anyone. www.youtube.com/watch?v=hm6USLq4rmE

And, Illinois has a strong pro-charter voice in our President-Elect::
www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdHBiByq6I8

Good Morning Gentlemen,

Saw your article in the Sunday Tribune (11-23-08). You have a very difficult hill to climb and I wish you well.I have been associated with CPS indirectly but especially with the schools of area 10 ( Little Village ) for the past three years.

My observations of this problem are!

Teachers who do not accept a better way of teaching their students.
Difficulty of removing inadequate performing teachers.
The need for post graduate education in teaching students.

The last is my main theme.
I am responsible for many professions now requiring post graduate courses to retain there license. I started with Optometry back in the early 70s. It has progressed through many professions. I have personally seen teachers on Professional development day check in and leave before lunch. At one meeting 400 teachers signed in and by the time the first speaker spoke after lunch only 6 teachers were present. Those who did not attend want papers signed that they checked out at 3:00 PM.

May I be of assistance to you in setting up a program for you in this area. I do have a masters in special education.. During the 70s and early 80s I ran a clinic treating add and adhd students. We were achieving 1 year improvement every 8 weeks when the school system were happy with one year in one year.

CONRAD MAZESKI
847-409-8347
GSCEM@YAHOO.COM

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.