Changing Course, Gutierrez Backs Strict Payday Loan Protections

The last time a local congressperson tried to amend a bill creating a Consumer Financial Protection Agency (CFPA), the intent was to protect lenders against stricter regulations. Illinois' Luis Gutierrez is taking a different approach. According to Politico, Gutierrez may soon introduce a bill to help protect borrowers from some of the worst abuses of the payday loan industry. From an article today:

Illinois Rep. Luis Gutierrez, a longtime foe of the payday industry, is considering offering a payday-specific amendment to CFPA legislation when it reaches the House floor that would cap interest rates on payday loans at 48 percent — and also force lenders to provide a 90-day fee-free repayment plan if a borrower couldn’t meet the original terms.

“We think it’s important that we give the clearest, most specific guidelines and instructions to our new consumer protection agency as possible. And we think that if there is an actor in the nonbanking financial institutions arena ... it is the payday lenders. Some of the most egregious violations in the consumer section occur under their watch,” Gutierrez said.

We might quibble with calling Gutierrez a "longtime foe" of payday lenders. But regardless, this proposed amendment represents a dramatic -- and welcome -- shift for the congressman. Just last spring, Gutierrez came under criticism for introducing a lax payday loan reform bill that would have set a federal annual interest rate ceiling at 390 percent for a two-week loan, effectively legitimized the existing products on the market. When questioned why the cap was not lower, he said during a committee hearing that implementing 36 percent cap on all consumer credit transactions as proposed by Sen. Dick Durbin was "not possible" because of the industry's clout in Washington. In making that claim, he failed to acknowledge that his own campaign had benefited greatly from industry campaign contributions in the past. In turn, he was whacked by consumer groups, editorial boards, and even Stephen Colbert.

But pressure by constituents and consumer advocates seems to have pushed him in the right direction. In July, Gutierrez decided to turn away any future campaign donations from the payday loan industry. Then, at a hearing in Washington earlier this month, Gutierrez accused credit card companies of exploiting his legislative goodwill and introduced a bill that would speed up implementation of the new consumer protections by more than two months. Now, he seems serious about protecting low-income borrowers from products that can best be described as debt traps.  We'll be watching to see whether he moves from "considering" such an amendment to actually introducing it.

Image used under a Creative Commons license by Flickr user Steve Rhodes.

Comments

It is good for him to make a bill that will protect the people from those abusive banks and lenders that offers them strict policies in making loans. But it is much better for people to repair their debts and not make any more loans to do. These debts only add to their burdens. Debt is a problem for a lot of people, and the credit hassles that go with it are frightening at times – and the best thing to do is to pay off debt. To pay off debt may not be the easiest task. You have to scrimp, save, and tighten your belt in order to scrounge up the extra funds. The best debt solutions are the ones where you either reduce expenditures, or augment income to pay the debt down – although there are debt consolidation companies out there, and they are perfectly legitimate. Also, try to work with your creditors if possible – to pay off debt will get them off your back, and will get you some debt relief.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.

Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.

We will not publish comments that we consider:

  • off-topic
  • long-winded or containing excessive text from another source
  • inflammatory
  • commercial promotion

Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.