UE Calls On Wells Fargo To Prevent "Jobicide"

Earlier this month, Baltimore officials filed a federal lawsuit against the embattled Wall Street bank Wells Fargo, alleging the company systematically singled out black residents for high-interest subprime mortgages, leading to a wave of foreclosures that is costing the city millions of dollars. The Chicago Reporter's Alden Loury asks an intriguing question: "If Baltimore sued Wells Fargo, why aren’t we?"

African-Americans in Baltimore received high-cost loans from Wells Fargo nearly 34 percent of the time two years ago.  Black borrowers in Chicagoland, meanwhile, took on similar loans more than 49 percent of the time. About 34 percent of Chicago-area African Americans earning $120,000 or more received high-cost, subprime loans from Wells Fargo in 2007 as well. Only 22 percent of white borrowers earning less than $40,000 were given the same loans. Similar trends existed in Baltimore (25 percent of wealthy blacks were issued subprime loans compared to 15 percent of low-earning whites) but were not as strong.

These disturbing figures led Attorney General Lisa Madigan to launch an investigation into whether Wells Fargo, along with Countrywide Financial, violated fair lending and civil rights laws by steering large numbers of African-Americans and Latinos into subprime mortgages. The AG's office eventually filed suit against the latter and reached a settlement worth $8.4 billion. No such action was taken against Wells.

Picketing outside of Well Fargo's Home Lending office on Chicago's North Avenue yesterday, members of the United Electrical Workers -- as well as community and religious groups -- lambasted the bank for its behavior. Decorating the sidewalk with fake murder chalk and caution tape, organizers accused Wells of committing "jobicide" in communities throughout the region. The protest, which appeared to perplex the crew of mortgage bankers standing inside the office, was part of a 22-city National Day of Action in which UE members and their allies called on the bank to stop acting as a "roadblock to economic recovery."

As we've reported, Wells is putting up just such a "roadblock" in Moline, where, 100 employees of Quad City Die Casting may be out of a job come July 12 after the bank cut off the company's financing. Yesterday, a group of clergy members -- led by Chicago's own C.J. Hawking --  attempted to present letters of concern to Wells Fargo's Eastern Region president explaining the effect on the community of liquidating the company. Folks who attended the action in Moline say the banks refused to speak with the religious leaders, instead choosing to call the police and bar them from the building. The bank has still refused to explain why it has decided to terminate the company's credit line before a new investor can be identified.

Comments

Yet one more reason why these banks should NOT be bailed out but be left to rot and die.

Wells Fargo is yet another example of the predatory big banks that have brought ruination upon the people of this country yet receive billions in profits from exorbitant fees, giving low deposit rates to savers, and charging some of the highest rates for loans and on credit card balances. But who do we have advising the President? Larry Summers and Tim Geithner, the protégés of Robert Rubin, et al who played a prominent role in the current economic crisis . They are friends of Goldman Sachs and the big banks like Wells Fargo, not the citizens of this country. Shame on these Wall Street minions for taking the taxpayers to the cleaners.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.

Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.

We will not publish comments that we consider:

  • off-topic
  • long-winded or containing excessive text from another source
  • inflammatory
  • commercial promotion

Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.