As the national battle over health care reform enters a crucial stage and lawmakers make their case to voters during the August recess, we're going to be regularly tracking the latest health care news across Illinois. Here's our first update:
Schock's Misleading Memo
While Illinois Democrats were busy advocating for comprehensive health care yesterday, Illinois Republicans kept up their effort to stand in the way of such reform. This morning over his Twitter feed, Rep. Aaron Schock sent along a memo, prepared by Republican Whip Eric Cantor (R-WI), providing (PDF) "key facts about the House Democrat health care bill for the 18th District of Illinois." But as you'll see, Cantor and Schock use the term facts rather loosely. Here's the first of many distortions in the two-page sheet:
Independent analysis by the Lewin Group shows that 2 out of every 3 people would lose their current coverage, including up to 114 million people who receive health benefits through their employer or other current coverage if a government-run plan “competes” with private companies.
The Lewin Group is hardly "independent." In fact, it's "wholly owned" by UnitedHealth Group, one of the nation's largest insurers. And the Congressional Budget Office released a preliminary analysis (PDF) of the House Democrats' so-called "tri-committee" bill last week and found that a net 3 million people will gain employer-based insurance under the Democratic plan.
But Schock and Cantor aren't done:
Nearly 11 million seniors choose Medicare Advantage plans as the coverage that best meet their needs. Specifically, the Democrats have proposed cutting Medicare spending for the 14,002 seniors in the 18th District who are currently enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan.
In fact, Medicare benefits will not be cut, nor will the Medicare Advantage plan be discontinued. Instead, Obama has proposed ending the large public subsidies to the private insurance companies who participate in the program. As budget director Peter Orszag explained this spring, the White House is proposing that these companies compete to offer their services, thereby saving taxpayers an estimated $150 billion over 10 years. (Also, it's more than ironic that Schock, a congressman staunchly opposed to a public option, is so worried about protecting benefits provided through the nation's very popular single-payer program.)
The Schock memo also demagogues about health care reform's potential effect on small businesses, citing Heritage Foundation research claiming that 41,700 small businesses in Illinois will be required to pay higher taxes because of a proposed 2 percent surtax on individuals with more than $280,000 in income. But the Heritage figures are way overblown. Only "1.9 percent of filers with any small-business income are projected to face either of the top two income tax rates in 2009,” according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities.
Roskam Misreads Polling ON WLS
Rep. Peter Roskam added his voice to the health care debate this morning, telling WLS Radio’s Don Wade & Roma that support for Obama's health care approach is "just dropping like a stone." Listen (The entier interview is available here):
People really understand health care. We’ve had a really robust national conversation and debate ever since the Clinton administration in 1993 did the big push on that plan. And we’ve been talking about it, all of us. And when you start to say that you’re going to be taking choices away, that wait times are going to go up, and ultimately this is going to be very costly, the public gets it. And the White House, with all due respect, I think they are really underestimating the public.
The polls tell a different story. The Center for American Progress' Ruy Teixiera points to Pew Research Center data proving Americans are still broadly supportive of the president's goals: 79 percent support "requiring insurance companies to sell health coverage to people, even if they have pre-existing medical condition;" 65 percent support "requiring that all Americans have health insurance, with the government providing financial help for those who can’t afford it;" 63 percent support "raising taxes on families with incomes of more than $350,000 and individuals earning more than $280,000;" and 52 percent support "a government health insurance plan to compete with private health insurance plans." "Don’t believe the hype," Teixiera concludes. "Health care reform is alive and kicking."
Bean, Foster Still Undecided
For the President's reform agenda to pass both chambers, conservative Democrats are going to need to come along for the ride. But two congressmen from Chicago's suburbs, Reps. Melissa Bean and Bill Foster, remain on the fence, according to the Daily Herald:
Bean's Schaumburg office has been protested by activists on both sides of the issue. Most recently, she said she was "unconvinced" the current plan will provide a net benefit to the middle class while reigning in costs.
Foster supports the plan "in theory," a spokeswoman has said, but neither lawmaker will likely face a vote until some version of the plan moves to the House floor this fall.
DCCC Blitzes Biggert
The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is also targeting Rep. Judy Biggert with its "Health Care ER" campaign. The goal of the blitz, which will include volunteer calls, emails, and tele-town halls, is to "hold targeted Republicans accountable for protecting health insurance companies' profits ... at the expense of affordable health care."







Comments
Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 08/05/2009 - 16:14
The only way you can accurately describe Medicare as "single payer" is to also report the facts that everyone DOES NOT qualify for it. The biggest requirement being one must be 65 years or older. If you happen to have relatives that work for the Federal government or one of its chartered properties then you might be able to qualify.
It's really unfortunate that Progress Illinois cannot itself become independent until it removes the shackles of the SEIU-Illinois Council. You cannot accurately report on any of these stories when you're just as wholly owned by a stakeholder as the Lewin Group.
Tuxiera is right and wrong. The President's "Health Care Reform" plan is dead. He abandoned it on July 22nd. It's now "Health Insurance Reform". Should anyone be surprised that stakeholders that could not broker a deal on Health Care Reform are now being forced to fight back after the Speaker of the House declares them villains.
This isn't the Change™ I had imagined.
Josh Kalven on Wed, 08/05/2009 - 17:00
Anon -
On the "single payer" issue, I'm not sure what you're complaining about in our post. None other than Quentin Young frequently describes Medicare as an example of a single payer program here in the U.S. For example:
DR. QUENTIN YOUNG: Well, let me say, we have single payer in this country. It was enacted in 1965. It’s called Medicare. And it was put through the Congress by Lyndon Johnson. And then, overnight—overnight, in one year, the system was put in place, and it’s probably the best insurance program in the whole country. The seniors of this country are highly dependent on Medicare. It’s kept them from penury, and that’s—it was done in one year, Amy. No drag-out, no problems. All the things that people worried about just didn’t happen.
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/3/11/dr_quentin_young_obama_confidante_...
Again, I'm not sure what was not "accurate" in the post above. I think it's perfectly reasonable to assume that our readers know Medicare is not available to the public at large.
Another Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 07:12
Judy Biggert put up a straw poll on her website Friday asking Do you support the health care proposal that's in the House right now?
The score when she yanked it down Monday morning was (69.4%) Yes, (21%) No, (9.6%) Don't Know/No opinion
Bill Baar (not verified) on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 14:54
Check the NYT around 1995 and you'll also find Young quoted to say he closed his practice to Medicaid patients because if he treated them he'd go broke.
If we turn US Health Care Financing into one huge Medicaid program, you have to wonder if we all won't go broke with.
Philosophe Forum on Fri, 08/07/2009 - 15:39
The man used Medicaid as an excuse. It is an easy one. I would expect that there were other contributing factors. Whatever happened, that was 1995. This is the second half of 2009. We have too many people falling through the cracks without health insurance. They cannot afford it. The Reform Bill is the only answer. It is way overdue. The country is desperate for it.
The professional, corporate-funded, Republican staffed P.R. mobs that are creating riots disguising their behavior as public discourse proves exactly who the real losers would become with this legislation: insurance companies. Spoiled children just throwing tantrums at the thought of losing so much control over human lives.
ALISON, MPA
Philosophe Forum
Post new comment
Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
We will not publish comments that we consider:
Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.