Here's our latest health care round-up:
Senate Finance Closer To Deal
The Washington Post has the scoop of the morning, reporting that Senate negotiators in the crucial Finance Committee -- the only committee with jurisdiction over health care that hasn't yet passed a bill -- may be close to reaching a bipartisan agreement. The "Gang of Six" will meet with President Obama today to discuss those details, which don't look promising with regards to the public option:
The emerging Finance Committee bill would shave about $100 billion off the projected trillion-dollar cost of the legislation over the next decade and eventually provide coverage to 94 percent of Americans, according to participants in the talks. It would expand Medicaid, crack down on insurers, abandon the government insurance option that President Obama is seeking and, for the first time, tax health-care benefits under the most generous plans. Backers say the bill would also offer the only concrete plan before Congress for reining in the skyrocketing cost of federal health programs over the long term.
The committee also seems to be coalescing around an idea pushed by Sen. John Kerry to raise revenue by taxing insurance companies on their most-expensive policies. Unlike the 2 percent surtax on the wealthy, this option has broader support.
How high the subsidy levels for the uninsured will extend and how the Medicaid expansion will be structured is still unknown. But right now, the objective is to get something out of committee by Obama's September 15 deadline to keep the ball rolling. If that can't be done in a bipartisan fashion, Obama says the Democrats may have to go at it alone. "I promise you, we will pass reform by the end of this year," he said in Indiana yesterday, "because the American people need it."
Broad Or Shallow Opposition?
On their newly redesigned site, Tribune reporter Janet Hook has an unnerving piece about the critics of Obama's reform effort who keep popping up at Congressional town halls across the country. To be sure, conservative activists are making their voices heard. Just last night in Normal, 300 people showed up to GOP Rep. Tim Johnson's health care meeting, mostly elderly and angry, including one woman who claimed "our country is going to be Marxist nation."
But Hook frames the piece around the idea that the "intensity of the opposition" is somehow indicative of the public's general skittishness about reform. As evidence, she cites one poll in the last paragraph that found support for Obama's health plan dropping slightly in the past month. But most other polls show that the health care reforms Obama has pushed for since campaign season are still very popular. After all, he was elected with wide margins less than a year ago running on those very principles. The Nation's Chris Hayes ably summed up how the media's fascination with the Tea Party phenomenom may be distorting the media's perspective:
The problem is the overwhelming instinct on the part of pundits and the MSM to look, and see old white men in overalls and Legionnaire hats and think they are watching someone give voice to the sentiments of broad swaths of the electorate. And it's just not true. What we're seeing at these events are the voices of radicals, extremists and zealots.
Suburban Congressmen Still Waffling
Yesterday, we pointed out that some suburban Democrats are still on the fence about whether to support the House package when it comes up for a full vote next month. That includes Rep. Melissa Bean, who the Pioneer Press notes has received a considerable amount of money from the health insurance lobby this year:
She has the task of keeping her constituents and contributors happy. Bean has raised $61,550 from insurance companies since the 2008 election, making insurance her top contributing industry, according to www.opensecrets.org.
In addition, the International Union of Operating Engineers is Bean's top single contributor since the 2008 election, donating $10,000, according to opensecrets, the Center for Responsive Politics' Web site.
[Correction (8/7): The $61,500 figure cited in the Pioneer Press story actually represents the amount Bean has received from the insurance industry at large and is mostly made up from property, casualty and life insurers such as AllState or State Farm. We're trying to track down the actual amount Bean received from health insurance interests in particular.]
The SouthtownStar's Kristen McQueary got in touch with staffers for Democratic Reps. Debbie Halvorson and Dan Lipinski, as well. Halvorson wouldn't commit one way or the other, but a spokesperson did say that the freshman congresswoman "is firm in her stance that reform cannot happen until we get it right." What she considers "right" is unclear.
Lipinski, who has already come out in support of a public option, also hinted that cost was a major factor in his decisionmaking. "It is critical," he said in a statement, "that this bill constitutes real reform and avoids pouring more money into a broken system."
Why We Fight
Finally, the Huffington Post's Arthur Delaney has a heart-wrenching story of a man from Libertyville who was denied coverage for a pre-existing condition after quitting his job to care for his mother and uncle in 2007. It's a good reminder about why this fight is so important: People's financial and physical life are at stake.







Comments
Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 10:53
here's another heart wrenching story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4u5x9XAsAs
Truth Be Told (not verified) on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 11:59
And yet another, as 20,000 Americans die every year lacking access to care.
And another peculiarly American tragedy, as Canada ranks far above the US when it comes to life expectancy and far below when it comes to infant and maternal mortality, and they cover their entire population for half per person of what we do with 50 million Americans uninsured.
Sorry, but I'm more interested in taking care of my fellow citizens before taking care of big business.
Free market health care has been tried and has failed.
Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 13:02
Countless Canadians die lacking acces to health care even though the have socialized medicine. When take 3-6 months to get an MRI to find out if that head ache is a brain tumor having "access" to health care is moot. 6 months later it's usually to late to do anything about it. That's not "taking care of your fellow citizens".
Canadians do live a couple years longer but they are less likely to die in a car crash or in violent crime. The mortality rate for all forms of cancer is better in the US than Canada becuase that needs to be caught early and the socialized model doesn't respond quickly. Wait times in the UK are over 18 weeks. European nations treat their patients with drugs and technology produced by for profit companies in the US. If that US profit model goes by the wayside who will lead the way for new adcancements on treatments? You may think that "free market health care has been tried and has failed" but socialized medicine has been tried and failed too.
Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 12:06
How's about Bill?
NBC is reporting this morning:
Rep. Bill Foster is also reportedly undecided; a spokesman says only that he supports the plan "in theory."
Josh Kalven on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 13:38
Anon 13:06 -
We noted Foster in yesterday's round-up:
http://progressillinois.com/2009/8/5/health-care-roundup-schock-bean
Anon 14:02 -
A different perspective on the Canadian health care system from someone who lived with it:
http://www.denverpost.com/recommended/ci_12523427
markg8 on Thu, 08/06/2009 - 21:04
"European nations treat their patients with drugs and technology produced by for profit companies in the US. If that US profit model goes by the wayside who will lead the way for new adcancements on treatments?"
That's complete nonsense but you go ahead and make that argument to the teabaggers. They'll be real happy to learn Republican politicians want to force us to keep subsidizing European health care.
hsr0601 (not verified) on Fri, 08/07/2009 - 03:22
According to the scoring of CBO on the prevention & wellness program, all fitness centers around the world should close down immediately and all media have to end reporting health tips about prevention.
Immune System & Levee System :
All of the excellent health systems seem to have one thing in common, a expansive, systematic preventative program requiring immense investments. I think a prevention system works as a 'levee' built against flood by the government, similarly, it also needs non-profit investments from the government 'on a large scale'.
This might offer us the clue of why all of the free states have public insurance policy in place.
It won't be easy to draw some specific numbers on the economic effect of the 'levee' , but the flood measure lacking a stable 'levee' would be a house on sand, as the too high level of 'preventable' chronic diseases in America shows.
At present, about 75 percent of each health dollar goes to treating chronic conditions.
When tests reveal patients are at risk of a chronic disease, physicians have no benefit to help them make necessary changes to stay healthy. Rather, the system today is designed around treating patients once they become sick.
If current health care system could shift a small percentage of total spending into programs that help prevent people from getting sick in the first place, it would dramatically reduce the overall cost of care.
Thankfully, the health care reform bill currently before Congress makes several key investments in preventive care, and those pieces of the PUBLIC OPTION must be maintained.
"An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.", said Benjamin Franklin , and 'Early Detection' goes beyond monetary value as we see the recent case.
As far as I'm concerned, the congress affected by the special interests has impeded the budget request for prevention program in Medicare & Medicaid. Let's imagine the costs and invaluable lives following the levee breach.
Thank You !
Post new comment
Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.
Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.
We will not publish comments that we consider:
Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.