All Flip-Flops Are Not Created Equal

Yesterday, we highlighted GOP U.S. Senate candidate Mark Kirk's recent explanation of his shifting position on cap-and-trade. Here's the short version: Kirk said that he voted in favor of the House bill earlier this year because it represented the "narrow interests" of his base in the 10th Congressional District; but if elected to the Senate he would vote against the proposal out of deference to his new, broader constituency.

In a Mechanics post today, Daniel Strauss makes a good point in response:

The danger is that this campaign angle could work. Kirk could get elected thinking that as long as he pays close attention to public opinion and makes decisions with it in mind, he'll be a great politician. But crafting strong legislation takes a long time and requires a great deal of certainty by politicians for good policies to pass. In contrast, public opinion can (and often does) change in the blink of an eye. As I've said in the past, in theory it makes sense to pay attention to only their constituents in deciding what stance to take but in actuality that's not such a good idea. Public opinion is an incredibly undependable entity, good policy is not. Politicians need to be stubborn to a degree because even those who they represent will have doubts at moments.

I briefly touched on this issue during my appearance on Ray Hanania's WJJG radio show this morning.  My point is essentially this:  All "flip-flops" are not created equal. Policy shifts made solely on the basis of political preservation deserve to be roundly criticized. On the other hand, lawmakers should be free to modify their position on individual issues, as long as they can explain what new information or analysis led to their change in thinking. After all, we elect public officials to be more focused and more informed than us on the policy matters of the day -- not to simply be conduits for our own shifting opinions. 

Kirk's recent comments on cap-and-trade show that, despite branding himself as an "independent," he will take whatever position best ensures victory in the nearest election -- even if it flies in the face of his longstanding record.  This might appease the right-wing of his party.  Unfortunately for him, that population is gradually diminishing in Illinois. And there are many other voters out there who are sure to be turned off.

Comments

as long as they can explain what new information or analysis led to their change in thinking.

Isn't Mark Kirk saying just that?

Anon -

What "new information" did Kirk point to in his explanation? All he said is he would take a different position as a U.S. Senator because a different constituency would have voted him into office.

He's not claiming he studied the issue closer and came to a different conclusion. He's instead suggesting he studied the polls and decided his original position was untenable. That's pure pandering.

As Greg Hinz writes (http://tinyurl.com/pw2b72) today: "Who knows what the man now really believes."

So, does Kirk think he can win Illinois while losing the 10th CD? Is that why he's embarking on a strategy of thumbing his nose at his current constituency?

He's instead suggesting he studied the polls and decided his original position was untenable. That's pure pandering.

Tell me progressives aren't going to start crying about the game of politics.

Kirk called a play from Politics 101.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Progress Illinois' intention is to foster community and to maintain a comfortable and constructive blogging environment. While we encourage and appreciates different points of view, we do not consider it our duty to give a voice to anybody with an opinion.

Discussion on this site is moderated. All comments submitted will be automatically held for review by the editors before posting. Your comment will not appear on the site until it has been approved.

We will not publish comments that we consider:

  • off-topic
  • long-winded or containing excessive text from another source
  • inflammatory
  • commercial promotion

Please leave a name or nickname when commenting, as it makes it easier for others to respond directly.