Like his Republican colleague Rep. Peter Roskam and other House GOP leaders, U.S. Senate candidate Mark Kirk is using the local airwaves to
advance the flimsy argument that President Obama is largely responsible for the exploding the national
debt. "Bush certainly had deficits," he told Fox Chicago's Mike Flannery on July 12, "but nothing compared to the deficits of today." (You can watch the full interview here.)
For some competing data, check out these graphs compiled by New York Times columnist Paul Krugman. They show that most of the nation's new debt piled up in the
first two quarters of 2009 --mere months into the Obama presidency and
before his policies had "begun to take effect." This famous graph produced by the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities is instructive, as well. The D.C.-based thinktank concludes that, were it not for the Bush-era
tax cuts (which Kirk supported), the cost of the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan (which Kirk supported), and the ongoing economic
slump, "we would not be facing these
huge deficits in the near term."