Explore our content

All types | All dates | All authors
Campaign finance
Quick Hit
by Micah Maidenberg
9:27am
Tue Oct 26, 2010

Kotowski: Beef Up Disclosure Requirements

State Sen. Dan Kotowski (D-Park Ridge) announced yesterday he will serve as chief sponsor of legislation that seeks to increase financial disclosure requirements for a raft of public officials and candidates across Illinois, and push for the bill's passage during the General Assembly's November veto session. Here's Kotowski and Illinois PIRG executive director Brian Imus talking about the proposal yesterday in Springfield:

Senate Bill 2216 seeks to make the state economic disclosure statement (PDF) more thorough and specific. It would amend the Illinois Governmental Ethics Act by requiring public officials to detail their income sources, much of their property interests, various liabilities, positions they hold in business enterprises and non-profits, future employment plans, honoria worth more than $200 and gifts worth more than $500. Those filing would also be charged with disclosing the interests of "immediate family members," including spouses, siblings, and children with whom they share a household.

The legislation includes new language about appointees to state boards and commissions as well. Appointees would be required to disclose contributions worth $150 or more to political committees and donations to political defense funds, as well as name any immediate family members who are registered as a state or federal lobbyist, in addition to filing their economic interest statement. All of this information is to be filed electronically and made available for search via a database on the Secretary of State's website. While the bill does not mention candidate tax returns -- an issue in the current gubernatorial campaign, with GOP Lieutenant Gov. candidate Jason Plummer refusing to release his and Bill Brady limiting access to his returns -- SB 2216's stipulations would clearly bump up the volume of information about public officials' financial interests in Illinois.

PI Original
by Micah Maidenberg
4:01pm
Fri Oct 22, 2010

A Torrent Of Secret Cash (VIDEO)

The Supreme Court's Citizens United decision has the state's airwaves crawling with advertisements paid for by opaque organizations.

Quick Hit
by Micah Maidenberg
4:40pm
Mon Sep 27, 2010

The Mayoral Race And The Money Game

When the clock strikes midnight on January 1, 2011, candidates for elected office in Illinois will for the first time ever be limited in terms of how much money contributors are able to dump into their campaign funds. Starting next year, individuals may donate $5,000 per candidate, per election cycle, according to the bill that Gov. Pat Quinn signed into law last December. The limit for businesses and unions is $10,000. For political action committees, it's $50,000. 

This could lead to some serious fundraising on New Year's Eve by the growing list of candidates running for Chicago's open mayoral seat. Cindi Canary, the executive director of the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform, told WBEZ she expected the mayoral candidates to do plenty of "jockeying for the big dollars" before the deadline. And for those candidates who aren't officially in the race yet, the looming law could influence the speed with which they make a decision.

Any contender for mayor needs enough money to get through the February 22, 2011 primary and, most likely, a run-off election that will be held April 5 (should no candidate earn 50 percent of the vote the first time around). What remains to be seen is if this tight schedule (as well as campaign contributors feeling "tapped out" after the November 2 election) will favor candidates who already have a well-stocked war chest at their disposal -- like Rahm Emanuel. The mayoral bid won't be a cheap race, after all. University of Illinois-Chicago political science prof Dick Simpson estimated that candidates will need at least $4 million to run. 

Quick Hit
by Adam Doster
9:40am
Thu Sep 16, 2010

One Small Patch Of Gubernatorial Common Ground

If there is one broad issue on which Bill Brady and Pat Quinn don't hold totally incompatible views, it's probably electoral and government reform. The two gubernatorial candidates filled out the CHANGE! Illinois candidate questionnaire and the coalition posted the results yesterday. Most notably, both support tighter lobbying rules, stiffer campaign contribution restrictions, and comprehensive redistricting reforms.

Still, they do differ on a few issues particularly important to progressive reformers. The Republican, for example, is undecided about whether the General Assembly should change where prison inmates are registered to vote. He also does not back public financing of elections in any capacity. Same-day voter registration, which is set to boost turnout by approximately 7 percent, isn't on his radar, either. You can find the full results here.