In his recent budget speech, Gov. Pat Quinn proposed closing Illinois’ Tamms “Supermax” prison. The facility’s 14-year history serves as an apt symbol of how the state’s incarceration system has lost its way.
In his recent budget speech, Gov. Pat Quinn proposed closing
Illinois’ Tamms “Supermax” prison. The facility’s 14-year history
serves as an apt symbol of how the state’s incarceration system has lost
its way.
Tamms was built in 1998, following the recommendations
of then-Governor Jim Edgar’s Task Force on Crime and Corrections. It was
intended as a temporary incarceration facility to separate out
particularly violent criminals from the general prison population. The
Task Force’s final report laid out in clear terms Tamm’s stated
objectives, as well as several crucial rules and regulations to prevent
the facility’s misuse.
Edgar’s Task Force, for instance, made
clear that prisoners were only supposed to be housed in Tamms
temporarily: “The
Super‐Max…is
a
management
tool
for
addressing
specific
security
problems…
To
serve
its
purpose,
inmates
must
move
in
and
out
based
on
some
objective
classification
and
standards.”
The
primary purpose mentioned above was to rehabilitate those causing
trouble in other prisons. Thus, the Task Force’s report argued,
prisoners must be allowed to earn their way out of Tamms based on good
behavior: “Inmates would be required to earn their way to progressively
less restrictive levels [of confinement], and eventually back into the
general prison population... Reviews of inmate behavior would be made
every 30 days.”
Additionally, the Task Force acknowledged that
supermax facilities in general contain “highly
restrictive
environments,” which, “if
misused,
can create
conditions
tantamount
to
longterm
isolation.” At Tamms, for example, such restrictions
include keeping prisoners in solitary confinement with sensory
deprivation for 23 hours each day. Imprisoning men in such conditions
for a substantial amount of time, the Task Force made clear, would
engender “legitimate and serious concerns” of prisoner abuse. To ensure
that such misuse would not occur, the report recommended “that
our
Super‐Max
facility
be
required
by
statute
to
conform
to
certain
requirements
concerning
constitutional
and
humanitarian
safeguards.”
As advocacy group Tamms Year Ten
has pointed out, these regulations were either never put in place or
never followed. (The group’s flier on the subject, from which the above
quotes were culled, is available here.)
Prisoners
have been housed at the Tamms facility indefinitely -- they have been
moved “in” but not “out.” A third of the current inmates have been
incarcerated at the supermax prison since 1998, according to Tamms Year Ten.
Some of these prisoners have long since reached the highest good
behavior “level” described by the Task Force; and yet they have not been
returned to the general prison population. Instead, they remain
imprisoned in exactly the sort of “long-term isolation” the Task Force
warned against.
Even as Tamms has failed to fulfill the
obligations -- both legal and moral -- laid out by Governor Edgar’s Task
Force, the supermax facility has continued to cost state taxpayers
millions of dollars each year. Due in part to its extremely high
guard-to-prisoner ratio, Tamms costs about three times as much to
operate per inmate as an average prison: over $30 million annually, or
roughly $64,000 for each prisoner. Governor Quinn’s office has estimated
that closing the facility will cut more than $20 million from the
budget annually.
In its extreme treatment of
prisoners, Tamms is unique among Illinois’ prison facilities. Yet the
supermax facility’s troubles elucidates the failures of the state’s
incarceration system more generally.
Just as Tamms was intended
to be a facility that rehabilitated violent criminals in order to
incorporate them back into the general prison population, Illinois’
prison system as a whole is intended to rehabilitate criminals so that
they may be reincorporated into the general civilian population. Aside
from the most violent criminals (like the ones at Tamms), prisoners in
general are supposed to be incarcerated temporarily; they are also
supposed to be able to earn their way out of confinement based on good
behavior. Prisoners in general, just like those at Tamms, are supposed
to be protected by “constitutional and humanitarian safeguards.”
Unfortunately,
just like its Tamms facility, the prison system in general has often
failed to meet its objectives. Illinois currently incarcerates more than
48,000 adult prisoners -- nine times as many as it held 40 years
ago, and 14,000 more than the system is currently designed to hold. As
with Tamms, the system as a whole has done a poor job of moving
prisoners “out” of its facilities. In 2010, for instance, Governor Quinn
suspended the Meritorious Good Time (MGT) program, which allowed
low-level offenders to earn their way out of prison with good behavior.
Instead,
prisoners remain incarcerated in facilities which, in their own way,
approach Tamms for their inhumanity. According to John Maki, who’s organization monitors state prison conditions, overcrowding has forced some prisons to keep inmates
“in flooded basements and vermin-infested dormitories with broken
windows, leaking pipes and dilapidated roofs.” If these conditions do
not improve, Illinois may face legal consequences: last year, the
U.S. Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling that found overcrowding and
poor conditions in California’s state penal system broke the
Constitution’s ban on “cruel and unusual punishment.”
Finally,
as with Tamms, concerns for Illinois’ prison system in general are not
merely moral and legal, but also fiscal. At a time when Illinois is
cutting funding for health care and other social services, the state
currently spends more than a $1 billion on its prisons.
Governor
Quinn is correct to say that closing Tamms makes fiscal sense. But it
will do little to alleviate the problems inherent in our state’s
incarceration system more generally. Indeed, Maki worries that the
closure will lead to further overcrowding in existing facilities, making
conditions even worse. A real solution to the state’s long-term budget
problems -- and to more immediate moral and legal concerns -- would
focus on moving less prisoners in and more prisoners out of the penal
system in a timely manner. In this way, Illinois can learn from the
lessons of Tamms.
Image: AP
Tamm was uniquely devised to subject prisoners to isolation and sensory deprivation. And those two treatments are uniquely capable -- indeed were precisely devised -- to drive a sane person crazy and to shatter the structure of the ego. This was what the Chinese did late in the Korean War -- we called it "brain washing." It is what the US did with internees at Guantanamo Bay, when we were not water boarding them. Another word for it is torture. The only humane solution to the problem of Tamms is to shut it down.
Comments
Login or register to post comments